| 0 comments ]

What is the best weapon to beat an old credit card debt? The answer is time or said in legal terms, the Statute of Limitations.

The Statute of Limitations is a deadline you have to sue someone. The Statute of Limitations is different for every type of lawsuit and varies from state to state. For example, in the state of New Jersey the Statute of Limitations for an open account or contract is six years. That means that a company has six years to file a lawsuit against you from the day you default on your agreement(the day you account became delinquent). One day beyond that six years, and their lawsuit is barred by the Statute of Limitations.

So the questions are; what Statute of Limitations applies and When did default occur? The most applicable Statute of Limitations will likely either be one for contract (may be for breach of contract) or for open account. An open account is essentially a line of revolving credit. You can find your state's appropriate Statute of Limitation from a link on the right side of this blog entitled "Debt Law (All 50 States)". Once you know how long the right Statute of Limitations is for your state, then you need to determine when default occurred.

If you are being sued for an old credit card debt that has been sold several times, then it is likely that the current owner has no idea or more importantly, no proof, of when you defaulted. You should argue that your default occured the day your first payment was due that you did not pay. Hopefully, you have some written evidence of that; a past due bill, a collection letter, etc. If you do not, then file an affidavit alleging the date and then the burden will shift to the debt purchaser to prove that the suit was not brought in violation of the Statute of Limitations.


Read more...
| 0 comments ]

1. The first thing to do is to take it SERIOUSLY. Don't treat it like one of the usual calls or letters you get from collection agencies regarding a past credit card bill, etc. It's very important that you give this your immediate attention. The consequences of a lawsuit can be devastating. Since a lawyer is now involved there may be deadlines that have been set into place that you may not even be aware of.

You may have to file a written answer within a certain period of time or you may have a limited amount of time to file any counter-claims. The first rule of being sued is to treat it with urgency and importance. If you don’t, you will most likely have to live with the consequences and regret it for a very long time. This is a mistake that I, myself, have made in the past and it was a long battle for me to correct that mistake.

2. The second thing you need to do is make a decision. Basically is this your debt or not? If it is your debt, then you should really consider paying it, coming up with some form of agreement or trying to fight them in court on the basis that they may not even have the appropriate evidence to prove the debt is yours. If it's not your debt, then a very different course of action is necessary.

If you recognize the debt as legitimately being yours and the amount of debt to be correct, then I would suggest trying to pay it. If you can pay it in full, then the faster the better. If you have any doubts to the amount of debt, statute of limitations, etc, and you have the time to do fight, then you need to start doing research here and now. We are always available to assist you. If the debt is legit and you can't pay it in full, then you should call the attorney who is suing you to try and come up with payments options. When you talk to them:

Be polite at all costs. Don’t create personal animosity between you and the attorney. It’s just business for the attorney. Don’t change that.

Explain your situation. Tell the lawyer exactly why you can’t pay the debt in full. Tell him about your employment situation, your assets, your obligations, the more information the better.

Document your situation. If there are any documents which back up your reason for not being able to pay in full immediately, offer to fax them to the attorney(unemployment documents, etc).

NOTE: Do not offer up any information or documents reguarding the debt itself! You do not want to help them prove their case against you.

Talk in terms of solutions. Don’t just say, "I can’t pay." Offer the attorney a method for satisfying the debt. An example would be a very low payment made on a weekly basis instead of a monthly basis (to demonstrate your commitment) coupled with a time line for increased payments as your situation improves. Offer to put the plan in writing. Of course, only offer what you can do and what you intend to actually follow through with. Do not send in any payment until the lawyer has returned a signed copy of your offer. You need to keep that on file for your records. Also do not give out any bank account information or credit card information! I would suggest sending in a money order every week and keeping the receipts. This will ensure your banking information will be kept private (routing numbers, etc.).

Give the attorney something to take back to his client. An attorney has a boss–his client. If he goes back to his client empty handed, he looks bad. Give him something he can show the client to prove that he is doing his job. The documentation of your situation, a signed payment plan, etc. are examples of items which allow an attorney to demonstrate to his client that progress is being made.

Stay in communication. If you can’t make a payment on a payment plan, call the lawyer. Don’t just let the date for payment come and go. Periodically ask the lawyer to verify your balance in writing. Update the lawyer on good and bad changes in your circumstances. This type of communication protects both you and the lawyer.

If Debt Is Not Yours:
Fight the lawsuit. If you can afford it, hire an attorney. And don’t make the decision that you can’t afford an attorney until you have at the very least talked to some attorneys. Get some recommendation for an attorney, don’t just pick a name out of the phone book. Talk to your friends who have used attorneys, get attorneys you know or call to make recommendations or search the internet.

If you truly can’t afford an attorney, you can represent yourself (Pro Se). You have to do alot of research in this area. I, myself, couldn't afford an attorney and I had a lot of sleepless nights trying to read up on rules of the court in my state, reading over the lawsuit for discrepencies, etc. If you do represent yourself;

Know where you stand. You will be operating in a completely foreign environment on the home court of your opponent. The attorney suing has spent years being educated in the law and has years of practical on the job experience. Research, research, research.

FDCPA is not a golden shield. Many consumers mistakenly believe the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act is a golden shield that will protect them. The FDCPA has it’s role and place and if the debt collection lawyer is acting outside the law, it is applicable. However, if you are facing a legitimate and ethically debt collection lawyer, the FDCPA is virtually useless as a defense and totally useless as a weapon.

Get help. Get help from wherever you can. There are tons of message boards out there dedicated to helping others in these situations. At the very least, search the internet and educate yourself. If you need our help, just contact us and we will try to help as much as we can.

Know dates. Dates and deadlines are crucial in a lawsuit. Once a deadline passes, it is past. A judge will not take pity on you or be more lenient because you are representing yourself. If you aren’t sure about a deadline or a date, ASK.

Learn the rules. Courts operate on the basis of rules, particularly Rules of Civil Procedure (how things are done) and Rules of Evidence (what a judge can see and hear). Get a copy of the rules that apply in the court that you have been sued in and learn them. If you don’t understand them, get help.

We ultimately want you to understand that being sued is serious and stressful, but is not the end of the world. If you chose to ignore the lawsuit, it will cause you credit and possibly financial problems later down the road.


Read more...
| 0 comments ]

Sometimes the simplest tools can be the most useful. This is a link to a free post-judgment interest calculator: http://www.nationaljudgment.net/intcalc.htm . While designed as a post-judgment interest calculator, it can be utilized to calculate the interest on any debt by merely inserting the date the debt was incurred and the interest rate applicable and hitting the calculate button.


Read more...
| 0 comments ]

Here is a sample letter informing a credit reporting agency that you have filed suit against them.



June 13, 2007

Equifax
1550 Peachtree Street
Atlanta, GA 30309

To Whom It May Concern:

Enclosed is a copy of the lawsuit that I filed against you in (my county) court on March 22, 2001. Currently the Pretrail Conference is scheduled for April 10th, 2001 at 9:30 A.M. in courtroom #33. The case number is (insert case #).

The reason the lawsuit was filed was due to a completely inadequate response from your company. When someone is the victim of identity theft, it is simply a nightmare trying to get false information removed from a credit file. I have contacted all of the false creditors listed on my credit file. I have challenged all of the false listings on my credit file. Nothing ever happens to fix the situation.

Over 90 days ago I wrote each the creditors in question and demanded proof that I am their customer. I asked for proof of the alleged debt, including specifically the alleged contract or other instrument bearing my signature. So far none of them has been able to provide such proof to me. I have sent follow-up letters to each of them and there is still no proof. I have attempted phone contact, but I simply get transferred around and nothing ever gets accomplished.

I have fully investigated my rights in this matter. Under the doctrine of estoppel by silence, Engelhardt v Gravens (Mo) 281 SW 715, 719, I may presume that no proof of the alleged debt, nor therefore any such debt, in fact exists. I have copies of the certified letters and dates prepared to bring to court on April 10th. Also, under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, these disputed items may not appear on my credit report if they cannot be supported by any evidence.

Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, if they cannot verify the debt within 30 days, then it must be removed. Your letters to me claim to have ‘verified’ the debt, but this is in fact not true under law. Simply contacting the alleged creditor and asking them to match up numbers in their database is no sufficient verification for identity theft. Of course the information matches up. Someone clearly used my information without my authorization.

Now I am suing Equifax for being such a pain in the posterior to me. I have provided more than sufficient evidence to get these false accounts removed.

You may contact me before April 10th at (my phone number) or at my address listed at the top of this letter. This matter can be settled simply by your agreement to remove the false information from my credit file.

I require a response, on point, in writing, hand signed, and in a timely manner. If I get another pointless letter from you saying that it has already been ‘verified’ then there will be no more opportunity for negotiation. This will proceed in court until I have successfully proven to a judge that this false information must be removed from my credit file. I will also be aggressively pursuing the full judgment that I can get against Equifax for violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and Defamation.

I have already won a similar lawsuit against Trans Union. Enclosed is a copy of that settlement. I will agree to a similar settlement with Equifax if you contact me before April 10th. If you accept the same terns as Trans Union did, then I will dismiss my lawsuit against Equifax and you will not need to appear in (my county and state).

The items to be removed from my credit report are listed as follows:

(listed 6 accounts and account numbers)

I look forward to your response.

Sincerely,

(my name)

If you would like to download a copy of this file as well as other helpful sample letters and information click here.

This letter is part of our information on Debt Validation. We have other sample letters to handle a variety of credit situations



Read more...
| 0 comments ]

Assuming you have contacted the collection agency using our debt validation methods, and they have failed to send you adequate proof of your legal obligation to pay a debt, this is the letter you need to write to the credit bureaus.

Company
Address 1
Address 2
City, State Zip

Date

RE: Account XXXXX-XXXX-XXXXX

Dear Sir/Madam:

I am continually being called on the telephone by your firm over an alleged $9000 debt. I'm sure you are aware of the provisions in the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), and I am requesting validation of this debt. I am requesting proof that I am indeed the party you are asking to pay this debt, and there is some contractual obligation which is binding on me to pay this debt. I request that you stop contacting us on the telephone and restrict your contact with us to writing, and only when you can provide adequate validation of this alleged debt. To refresh your memory on what constitutes legal validation, I am giving a list of the required documentation:

  • Complete payment history, the requirement of which has been established via Spears v Brennan 745 N.E.2d 862; 2001 Ind. App. LEXIS 509 and
  • Agreement that bears the signature of the alleged debtor wherein he agreed to pay the original creditor.
  • Letter of sale or assignment from the original creditor to your company. (Agreement with your client that grants you the authority to collect on this alleged debt.) Coppola v. Arrow Financial Services, 302CV577, 2002 WL 32173704(D.Conn., Oct. 29, 2002) - Information relating to the purchase of a bad debt is not proprietary or burdensome. Debtor must phrase their request clearly to obtain: The source of a debt and the amount a bad debt buyer paid for plaintiff's debt, how amount sought was calculated, where in issue a list of reports to credit bureaus, and documents conferring authority on defendant to collect debt.
  • Intimate knowledge of the creation of the debt by you, the collection agency.

I'm sure you know, under FDCPA Section 809 (b), you are not allowed to pursue collection activity until the debt is validated. You should be made aware that in TWYLA BOATLEY, Plaintiff, vs. DIEM CORPORATION, No. CIV 03-0762 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, 2004, the courts ruled that reporting a collection account indeed is considered collection activity.

While I prefer not to litigate, I will use the courts as needed to enforce my rights under the FDCPA.

I look forward to an uneventful resolution of this matter.

Sincerely,

Signature
Your Name
Your Address
City, State Zip

enclosures

If you would like to download a copy of this file as well as other helpful sample letters and information click here.

This letter is part of our information on Debt Validation. We have other sample letters to handle a variety of credit situations.




Read more...
| 0 comments ]

Sometimes you may have trouble writing a creditor or a collection agency because you don't know where to send them letters. Here are some resources:

Google Is Your Friend: http://www.google.com

The Better Business Bureau - http://www.bbb.org

http://www.millcbs.com/search.asp

http://www.411collectionagencies.com/AGENCIES_US/

Resident agents information in your state: http://www.residentagentinfo.com

Other links:

You can find some of the addresses and all of the phone numbers (some toll-free!) here: http://www.bestinservice.com/Resources/CreditorRolodex/Creditor_A/creditor_a.html

If this doesn't work, try calling your secretary of state.


Read more...
| 0 comments ]

Here's a a sample letter requesting a collection agency to validate that they owe you a debt. You can also try some of our other sample letters as well. Confused about how to use this form or have questions about debt validation? We are here to help each other! Contact us today!

Attempt to Validate Debt:

Under the Federal Debt Collection Practices Act, you are allowed to challenge the validity of a debt that a collection agency states you owe to them. Use this letter and the following form to make the agency verify that the debt is actually yours and owed by you. Keep a copy for your files and send the letter certified with return receipt.

Your Name
123 Your Street Address
Your City, ST 01234

ABC Collections
123 NotOnYourLife Ave
Chicago, IL

Date:

Re: Acct # XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX

To Whom It May Concern:

This letter is being sent to you in response to a notice sent to me on September 30, 2002). Be advised that this is not a refusal to pay, but a notice sent pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 USC 1692g Sec. 809 (b) that your claim is disputed and validation is requested.

This is NOT a request for “verification” or proof of my mailing address, but a request for VALIDATION made pursuant to the above named Title and Section. I respectfully request that your offices provide me with competent evidence that I have any legal obligation to pay you.

Please provide me with the following:

  • What the money you say I owe is for;
  • Explain and show me how you calculated what you say I owe;
  • Provide me with copies of any papers that show I agreed to pay what you say I owe;
  • Provide a verification or copy of any judgment if applicable;
  • Identify the original creditor;
  • Prove the Statute of Limitations has not expired on this account
  • Show me that you are licensed to collect in my state
  • Provide me with your license numbers and Registered Agent

    At this time I will also inform you that if your offices have reported invalidated information to any of the 3 major Credit Bureau’s (Equifax, Experian or TransUnion) this action might constitute fraud under both Federal and State Laws. Due to this fact, if any negative mark is found on any of my credit reports by your company or the company that you represent I will not hesitate in bringing legal action against you for the following:

    • Violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act
    • Violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
    • Defamation of Character

    If your offices are able to provide the proper documentation as requested in the following Declaration, I will require at least 30 days to investigate this information and during such time all collection activity must cease and desist.

    Also during this validation period, if any action is taken which could be considered detrimental to any of my credit reports, I will consult with my legal counsel for suit. This includes any listing any information to a credit reporting repository that could be inaccurate or invalidated or verifying an account as accurate when in fact there is no provided proof that it is.

    If your offices fail to respond to this validation request within 30 days from the date of your receipt, all references to this account must be deleted and completely removed from my credit file and a copy of such deletion request shall be sent to me immediately.

    I would also like to request, in writing, that no telephone contact be made by your offices to my home or to my place of employment. If your offices attempt telephone communication with me, including but not limited to computer generated calls and calls or correspondence sent to or with any third parties, it will be considered harassment and I will have no choice but to file suit. All future communications with me MUST be done in writing and sent to the address noted in this letter by USPS.

    It would be advisable that you assure that your records are in order before I am forced to take legal action. This is an attempt to correct your records, any information obtained shall be used for that purpose.

    Best Regards,

    Your Signature
    Your Name

    If you would like to obtain this letter as well as other helpful sample letters and information reguarding credit issues, please click here.



  • Read more...
    | 0 comments ]

    Your state attorney general is the consumer's best friend, especially in the area of credit issues. They can advice you how to proceed in all matters of law, tell you what paperwork you need, help you find affordable representation, give you statutes, cite legal precedences pertinent to your state, get you in touch with the consumer protection agency. As a matter of fact, in many states, the attorney general shares his or her office with the state consumer protection agency. We often advise people to give their attorney general's office a call whenever we don't know the answer to a legal question, especially about state banking laws, divorce, bankruptcy and what action to take if a creditor does not treat you fairly. You are not bothering them...You are the reason their offices exist. They are there to advise the public. That's how their earn their bread and butter, so don't be afraid to contact them. Below is contact information for various states:

    State Attorney General Phone

    Alabama:Troy King (R)(334) 242-7300
    State House, 11 S. Union St. Montgomery, AL 36130
    http://www.ago.state.al.us

    Alaska:David W. Márquez (R)(907) 465-3600
    P.O. Box 110300, Diamond Courthouse, Juneau, AK 99811-0300
    http://www.law.state.ak.us/

    American Samoa:Malaetasi M. Togafau (684) 633-4163
    American Samoa Gov't, Exec. Ofc. Bldg, Utulei, Territory of American Samoa, Pago Pago, AS 96799
    http://www.samoanet.com/asg/asgdla97.html

    Arizona:Terry Goddard (D)(602) 542-4266
    1275 W. Washington St., Phoenix, AZ 85007
    http://www.azag.gov/

    Arkansas:Mike Beebe (D)(800) 482-8982
    200 Tower Bldg., 323 Center St., Little Rock, AR 72201-2610
    http://www.ag.state.ar.us

    California:Bill Lockyer (D)(916) 445-9555
    1300 I St., Ste. 1740, Sacramento, CA 95814
    http://ag.ca.gov

    Colorado:John Suthers (R)(303) 866-4500
    1525 Sherman Street, Denver, CO 80203
    http://www.ago.state.co.us/index.cfm

    Connecticut:Richard Blumenthal (D)(860) 808-5318
    55 Elm St., Hartford, CT 06141-0120
    http://www.ct.gov/ag/

    Delaware:Carl C. Danberg (D)(302) 577-8338
    Carvel State Office Bldg., 820 N. French St., Wilmington, DE 19801
    http://www.state.de.us/attgen

    District of Columbia:Robert Spagnoletti (D)(202) 724-1305
    John A. Wilson Building, 1350 PA Ave, NW Suite 409, Washington, DC 20009
    http://occ.dc.gov

    Florida:Charlie Crist (R)(850) 414-3300
    The Capitol, PL 01, Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050
    http://myfloridalegal.com/

    Georgia:Thurbert E. Baker (D)(404) 656-3300
    40 Capitol Square, SW, Atlanta, GA 30334-1300
    http://ganet.org/ago/

    Guam:Douglas Moylan (671) 475-3409
    Judicial Center Bldg., Ste. 2-200E, 120 W. O'Brien Dr., Hagatna, Guam 96910
    http://www.guamattorneygeneral.com/

    Hawaii:Mark J. Bennett (R)(808) 586-1500
    425 Queen St., Honolulu, HI 96813
    http://www.state.hi.us/ag/index.html

    Idaho:Lawrence Wasden (R)(208) 334-2400
    Statehouse, Boise, ID 83720-1000
    http://www2.state.id.us/ag/

    Illinois:Lisa Madigan (D)(312) 814-3000
    James R. Thompson Ctr., 100 W. Randolph St., Chicago, IL 60601
    http://illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/

    Indiana:Steve Carter (R)(317) 232-6201
    Indiana Government Center South - 5th Floor, 402 West Washington Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204
    http://www.in.gov/attorneygeneral/

    Iowa:Tom Miller (D)(515) 281-5164
    Hoover State Office Bldg., 1305 E. Walnut, Des Moines, IA 50319
    http://www.IowaAttorneyGeneral.org

    Kansas:Phill Kline (R)(785) 296-2215
    120 S.W. 10th Ave., 2nd Fl., Topeka, KS 66612-1597
    http://www.ink.org/public/ksag

    Kentucky:Greg Stumbo (D)(502) 696-5300
    State Capitol, Rm. 116, Frankfort, KY 40601
    http://ag.ky.gov

    Louisiana:Charles Foti (D)(225) 342-7013
    P.O. Box 94095, Baton Rouge, LA 70804-4095
    http://www.ag.state.la.us/

    Maine:G. Steven Rowe (D)(207) 626-8800
    State House Station 6, Augusta, ME 04333
    http://www.state.me.us/ag

    Maryland:J. Joseph Curran Jr. (D)(410) 576-6300
    200 St. Paul Place, Baltimore, MD 21202-2202
    http://www.oag.state.md.us

    Massachusetts:Tom Reilly (D)(617) 727-2200
    1 Ashburton Place, Boston, MA 02108-1698
    http://www.ago.state.ma.us

    Michigan:Mike Cox (R)(517) 373-1110
    P.O.Box 30212, 525 W. Ottawa St., Lansing, MI 48909-0212
    http://www.michigan.gov/ag (you will have to type this one in)

    Minnesota:Mike Hatch (D)(651) 296-3353
    State Capitol, Ste. 102, St. Paul, MN 55155
    http://www.ag.state.mn.us/

    Mississippi:Jim Hood (D)(601) 359-3680
    Department of Justice, P.O. Box 220, Jackson, MS 37205-0220
    http://www.ago.state.ms.us/

    Missouri:Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon (D)(573) 751-3321
    Supreme Ct. Bldg., 207 W. High St., Jefferson City, MO 65101
    http://www.ago.mo.gov/

    Montana:Mike McGrath (D)(406) 444-2026
    Justice Bldg., 215 N. Sanders, Helena, MT 59620-1401
    http://www.doj.mt.gov

    Nebraska:Jon Bruning (R)(402) 471-2682
    State Capitol, P.O.Box 98920, Lincoln, NE 68509-8920
    http://www.ago.state.ne.us/

    Nevada:George J. Chanos (R)(775) 684-1100
    Old Supreme Ct. Bldg., 100 N. Carson St., Carson City, NV 89701
    http://ag.state.nv.us/

    New Hampshire:Kelly Ayotte (R)(603) 271-3658
    State House Annex, 33 Capitol St., Concord, NH 03301-6397
    http://www.state.nh.us/nhdoj/

    New Jersey:Zulima V. Farber (D)(609) 292-8740
    Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex, 25 Market St., CN 080, Trenton, NJ 08625
    http://www.state.nj.us/lps/

    New Mexico:Patricia A. Madrid (D)(505) 827-6000
    P.O. Drawer 1508, Sante Fe, NM 87504-1508
    http://www.ago.state.nm.us

    New York:Eliot Spitzer (D)(518) 474-7330
    Dept. of Law - The Capitol, 2nd fl., Albany, NY 12224
    http://www.oag.state.ny.us

    North Carolina:Roy Cooper (D)(919) 716-6400
    Dept. of Justice, P.O.Box 629, Raleigh, NC 27602-0629
    http://www.ncdoj.com/default.jsp

    North Dakota:Wayne Stenehjem (R)(701) 328-2210
    State Capitol, 600 E. Boulevard Ave., Bismarck, ND 58505-0040
    http://www.ag.state.nd.us

    Northern Mariana Islands:Matt Gregory (670) 664-2341
    Caller Box 10007, Capitol Hill, Saipan, MP 95960
    http://www.cnmiago.gov.mp/

    Ohio:Jim Petro (R)(614) 466-4320
    State Office Tower, 30 E. Broad St., Columbus, OH 43266-0410
    http://www.ag.state.oh.us

    Oklahoma:W. A. Drew Edmondson (D)(405) 521-3921
    State Capitol, Rm. 112, 2300 N. Lincoln Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73105
    http://www.oag.state.ok.us

    Oregon:Hardy Myers (D)(503) 378-4732
    Justice Bldg., 1162 Court St., NE, Salem, OR 97301
    http://www.doj.state.or.us

    Pennsylvania:Tom Corbett (R)(717) 787-3391
    1600 Strawberry Square, Harrisburg, PA 17120
    http://www.attorneygeneral.gov

    Puerto Rico:Roberto J. Sanchez-Ramos (787) 721-2900
    GPO Box 902192, San Juan, PR 00902-0192
    http://www.justicia.gobierno.pr

    Rhode Island:Patrick Lynch (D)(401) 274-4400
    150 S. Main St., Providence, RI 02903
    http://www.riag.state.ri.us

    South Carolina:Henry McMaster (R)(803) 734-3970
    Rembert C. Dennis Office Bldg., P.O.Box 11549, Columbia, SC 29211-1549
    http://www.scattorneygeneral.org

    South Dakota:Larry Long (R)(605) 773-3215
    1302 East Highway 14, Suite 1, Pierre, SD 57501-8501
    http://www.state.sd.us/attorney/

    Tennessee:Paul G. Summers (D)(615) 741-5860
    500 Charlotte Ave., Nashville, TN 37243
    http://www.attorneygeneral.state.tn.us

    Texas:Greg Abbott (R)(512) 463-2100
    Capitol Station, P.O.Box 12548, Austin, TX 78711-2548
    http://www.oag.state.tx.us

    Utah:Mark Shurtleff (R)(801) 538-9600
    State Capitol, Rm. 236, Salt Lake City, UT 84114-0810
    http://attorneygeneral.utah.gov/

    Vermont:William H. Sorrell (D)(802) 828-3173
    109 State St., Montpelier, VT 05609-1001
    http://www.state.vt.us/atg

    Virgin Islands:Kerry Drue (340) 774-5666
    Dept. of Justice, G.E.R.S. Complex 488-50C Kronprinsdens Gade, St. Thomas, VI 00802

    Virginia:Bob McDonnell (R)(804) 786-2071
    900 E. Main St., Richmond, VA 23219
    http://www.oag.state.va.us

    Washington:Rob McKenna (R)(360) 753-6200
    900 Fourth Street, Suite 2000, Olympia, WA 98504-0100
    http://www.atg.wa.gov/

    West Virginia:Darrell V. McGraw Jr. (D)(304) 558-2021
    State Capitol, 1900 Kanawha Blvd. , E., Charleston, WV 25305
    http://www.wvago.us/

    Wisconsin:Peg Lautenschlager (D)(608) 266-1221
    State Capitol, Ste. 114 E., P.O.Box 7857, Madison, WI 53707-7857
    http://www.doj.state.wi.us

    Wyoming:Pat Crank (D)(307) 777-7841
    State Capitol Bldg., Cheyenne, WY 82002
    http://attorneygeneral.state.wy.us

    Source: http://www.naag.org/


    Read more...
    | 0 comments ]

    If your credit problems have progressed to the point where your creditors have turned your case over to collection agencies, it is important to know your legal rights.
    Collection agencies are not allowed to:

    • Call your office;
    • Call your home before 8am or after 9pm;
    • Address you in an abusive manner;
    • Harass you;
    • Call friends or family in an attempt to collect your debt;
    • Add unauthorized charges;
    • Make false or misleading statements;

    If any of the above is happening to you, tell the collection agency to stop harassing you. If it continues, make sure you get the name of the collection agency and address and report them to the Better Business Bureau, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), or your state's attorney general's office. The federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act also states that you can demand that the collection agency stop contacting you, except to tell you that collection efforts have ended or that the creditor or collection agency will sue you. However, you MUST put your request in writing.

    NOTE: The FDCPA only applies to bill collectors who work for collection agencies, not the original creditors, so you will not be able to get the collection department your credit card company to stop calling you with a letter. Only New York City has a local consumer protection law that requires the original creditor to stop calling you after a written request to do so.


    When Collectors Break The Law:

    If a bill collector violates the FDCPA, try and see if you can get the illegal behavior on tape. Taping is permitted without the collector's knowledge in all states except CA, CT, DE, FL, IL, MD, MA, MI, MT, NH, PA, and WA. At the very least, write down as much of what the bill collector says on paper. Don't forget to include the date and time of the conversation and if at all possible the rep's name or I.D. number. Then file a complaint in writing. You can even file a complaint if you don't have a witness to any of these conversations, but a witness helps. The correct agency to file your complaint with is the FTC. You can even file a complaint online:

    Federal Trade Commission
    6th Street & Pennsylvania Ave MW
    Washington, DC 20805
    202-326-2222
    http://www.ftc.gov

    Next, complain to your state consumer protection agency. Then send a copy of your complaint to the creditor who hired the collection agency. If the violations are severe enough, the creditor may stop the collection efforts.

    If the violations are ongoing, you can sue the collection agency (and the creditor that hired the agency) for up to $1,000.00 in small claims court for violating the FTC regulations (note: you probably won't win if you can prove only a few minor violations). If the violations are outrageous, you can sue the collection agency and creditor in regular civil or small claims court.


    Common Collections Tactics and Rebuttals:

    Some collection agencies do employ collection methods involving the use of false and misleading statements. Just like any other high pressure salesman, these guys will make lots of "helpful" suggestions to get you to close the deal NOW. They will always try to get you to pay up right then and there. Some examples:

    • Insist you FedEx or Express your check to them (Can you really afford to add $20+ to the debt you already can't pay?)
    • Charge it on your credit card. (Sure, charge up the old card - isn't this how you got into trouble in the first place?)
    • They will try to get you to pay by "telecheck". This means you give them your checking account number, and they deduct the amount electronically. Are you crazy? NEVER give out your checking account and check routing numbers.
    While the FDCPA allows a collector to add interest if your original agreement calls for the addition of interest during collection proceedings, or the addition of such interest is allowed under state law, it is not necessary to spend the money or risk your checking account for any of the above methods. The three or four days it may take to mail a payment with a first class stamp, if they do decide to come after you for interest, won't break the bank.

    If You Can't Pay:


    It is generally in your best interest to settle your debts as quickly as possible, or use the debt validation techniques, or by settling your debts. Before obtaining a court judgment, a bill collector generally has only one way of getting paid: Demand payment by calling you and sending you threatening letters. If you refuse, the collector can't do much else short of suing you. Once the collector (or creditor) does sue and gets a judgment, however, you can expect more aggressive collections actions:

    • If you have a job, the collector will try to garnish up to 25% of your net wages.
    • The collector also may try to seize any bank or other deposit accounts you have.
    • If you own real property (real estate), the collector will probably record a lien, which will have to be paid when you sell or refinance your property.

    Some collection agencies will agree to settle with you for far less than you owe and then turn around and hire another collection agency to collect the difference. However, in many states this is illegal. Once a creditor deposits or cashes a full payment check, even if she strikes out the words "payment in full," or writes "I don't agree" on the check, she can't come after you for the balance. The states in which this law is enforced include:

    ArkansasColorado Connecticut Georgia
    Kansas Louisiana Maine Michigan
    Nebraska New Jersey North Carolina Oregon
    Pennsylvania Texas Utah Vermont
    Virginia Washington Wyoming

    Some states have modified this rule. In the following states, if a creditor cashes a full payment check and explicitly retains his right to sue you by writing "under protest or without prejudice" with his endorsement, then he can come after you for the balance. But those exact words must be used. If he writes "without recourse," communicates with you separately, notifies you verbally, or writes on the check that it is partial payment, it is not enough.

    Alabama Delaware Massachusetts Minnesota
    Missouri New Hampshire New York Ohio
    Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota West Virginia
    Wisconsin















    Read more...
    | 3 comments ]

    What is a Junk Debt Buyer?

    A junk debt buyer is a collection agency who has purchased a large portfolio of delinquent or charged off accounts from credit card companies, or even other collection agencies. Also referred to in the industry as "bad debt buyers", "zombie debt collectors", or simply "debt buyers", these companies fall under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act definition of Collection Agency ("CA"). As the visibility and profitability of this rapidly expanding new industry has grown, junk debt buyers range in size from small private businesses up to million dollar publicly traded Wall-Street companies! Credit card debt accounts for nearly 70% of the accounts sold to JDBs, followed by auto loans, telecommunications debt and retail accounts.

    What to be Aware Of

    Junk debt buyers generally buy alleged debts for cents on the dollar and then attempt to find ways to collect on the debt. Often times, the debt is "out-of-statute" (Thatmeans that the statute of limitations has expired and it no longer legally needs to be paid back). The buyer then attempts to get the debtor to pay a small portion of the debt or the entire plus added on interest, or "other" fees. If the debtor does pay on the debt, they have reaffirmed the debt and started the statute of limitations all over again.

    For example...Lets say that you owed a credit card company $800 and, for whatever reason, you have been unable to pay on that debt for 3 years. The statute of limitations in your state, for example, is 4 years in the state you live. At this point, legally you don't even have to repay this debt. The credit card company has long since written it off and sold your account to a JDB. Its over 3 years later and the JDB is attempting to collect this amount from you. After numerous letters and threats, you decide to try and make payment arrangements and send them a payment(no matter how small)...You have now reset the statute of limitations on this debt.

    It is very important that consumers be aware of their rights and the laws that protect them as an alarmingly large number of these debt buyers are barely operating within the law.

    Some typical unacceptable practices by JDBs include pursuing debts that are not actually owned by the consumer in question; harassment or verbal abuse; multiple listings of the same debt; and, as stated previously, attempting to collect a debt that has passed it's statute of limitations. Frequently in these situations, the JDBs will use the practice of "re-aging" an account which basically means that they report it as more recent than it really is.

    An abbreviated list of JDB's:

    • Asset Acceptance (AAC)*
    • Sherman Acquisitions/Sherman Financial Group/Alegis
    • NCO Group*
    • Portfolio Recovery Assoc.*
    • Asta Funding* Encore Capital Group (parent of Midland Credit Mgmt)*
    • Allied National/Interstate Risk Management Alternatives (RMA)
    • JBC & Associates Arrow Fin. Svcs. (majority interest acquired by Sallie Mae 9/04)
    • RJM Acquisitions
    • CAMCO (Capital Acquisitions & Mgmt Co)*
    • New Century Financial
    • Excalibur
    • Cavalry Portfolio Services
    • Unifund Group
    • Phoenix Asset Acceptance
    • First Select Corporation (part of Providian)
    • Collins Financial Services
    • Oliphant Financial Corp.
    • OSI Portfolio Services

    *These have been the subject of recent FTC legal actions and penalties for illegal/abusive collection practices.

    How much do JDB's pay for portfolios of debt?

    • Debts that have recently been charged off: 6 to 7 cents on the dollar.
    • Accounts that are slightly older and on which a collection agency or two has already taken a whack: 1.5 cents to 2 cents on the dollar.
    • Years-old, out-of-statute debts: A penny or less.

    * Source: Sean McVity, portfolio broker at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods.

    The above figures are handy when calculating how much you should offer as a settlement to these companies.


    Read more...
    | 0 comments ]

    There are many ways to get a free copy of your credit report.

    All credit bureaus are required to give out one free credit report per year. You can order your free annual credit report online at www.annualcreditreport.com, by calling 877-322-8228, or by completing the Annual Credit Report Request Form and mailing it to: Annual Credit Report Request Service, P.O. Box 105281, Atlanta, GA 30348-5281. When you order, you need to provide your name, address, Social Security number, and date of birth. To verify your identity, you may need to provide some information that only you would know, like the amount of your monthly mortgage payment.

    Note: The Credit Bureaus are not required to give out your credit score for free.
    If you want to order your score in addition to your free report it's about $5.95 per bureau. The free reports are good for 30 days only, so make sure you print your reports if you get them online. The other thing is that if you do any credit disputes after pulling your free report, the credit bureaus have 45 days instead of 30 days to pull your credit reports. Nothing is ever really free, is it? This could mean the difference, in all seriousness, in getting a deletion because of the extra time they have to "investigate".

    Beware! There are some web sites out there who are posing as the free annual credit report site who are engaged in fraudulent activities.


    Read more...
    | 0 comments ]

    The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA)...This is your tool to credit freedom and will protect you in times of trouble. It is the heart of getting rid of collections and collection agencies, enabling you to use real legal threats against those who are ruining your chances for a better life. This is the tool you use when applying a debt validation procedure.


    THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT


    As amended by Public Law 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009 (Sept. 30, 1996)

    To amend the Consumer Credit Protection Act to prohibit abusive practices by debt collectors.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Consumer Credit Protection Act (15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new title:

    TITLE VIII - DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES [Fair Debt Collection Practices Act]

    Sec.
    801. Short Title
    802. Congressional findings and declaration of purpose
    803. Definitions
    804. Acquisition of location information
    805. Communication in connection with debt collection
    806. Harassment or abuse
    807. False or misleading representations
    808. Unfair practice
    809. Validation of debts
    810. Multiple debts
    811. Legal actions by debt collectors
    812. Furnishing certain deceptive forms
    813. Civil liability
    814. Administrative enforcement
    815. Reports to Congress by the Commission
    816. Relation to State laws
    817. Exemption for State regulation
    818. Effective date

    § 801. Short Title [15 USC 1601 note]

    This title may be cited as the "Fair Debt Collection Practices Act."

    § 802. Congressional findings and declarations of purpose [15 USC 1692]

    (a) There is abundant evidence of the use of abusive, deceptive, and unfair debt collection practices by many debt collectors. Abusive debt collection practices contribute to the number of personal bankruptcies, to marital instability, to the loss of jobs, and to invasions of individual privacy.

    (b) Existing laws and procedures for redressing these injuries are inadequate to protect consumers.

    (c) Means other than misrepresentation or other abusive debt collection practices are available for the effective collection of debts.

    (d) Abusive debt collection practices are carried on to a substantial extent in interstate commerce and through means and instrumentality's of such commerce. Even where abusive debt collection practices are purely intrastate in character, they nevertheless directly affect interstate commerce.

    (e) It is the purpose of this title to eliminate abusive debt collection practices by debt collectors, to insure that those debt collectors who refrain from using abusive debt collection practices are not competitively disadvantaged, and to promote consistent State action to protect consumers against debt collection abuses.

    § 803. Definitions [15 USC 1692a]

    As used in this title --

    (1) The term "Commission" means the Federal Trade Commission.

    (2) The term "communication" means the conveying of information regarding a debt directly or indirectly to any person through any medium.

    (3) The term "consumer" means any natural person obligated or allegedly obligated to pay any debt.

    (4) The term "creditor" means any person who offers or extends credit creating a debt or to whom a debt is owed, but such term does not include any person to the extent that he receives an assignment or transfer of a debt in default solely for the purpose of facilitating collection of such debt for another.

    (5) The term "debt" means any obligation or alleged obligation of a consumer to pay money arising out of a transaction in which the money, property, insurance or services which are the subject of the transaction are primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, whether or not such obligation has been reduced to judgment.

    (6) The term "debt collector" means any person who uses any instrumentality of interstate commerce or the mails in any business the principal purpose of which is the collection of any debts, or who regularly collects or attempts to collect, directly or indirectly, debts owed or due or asserted to be owed or due another. Notwithstanding the exclusion provided by clause (F) of the last sentence of this paragraph, the term includes any creditor who, in the process of collecting his own debts, uses any name other than his own which would indicate that a third person is collecting or attempting to collect such debts. For the purpose of section 808(6), such term also includes any person who uses any instrumentality of interstate commerce or the mails in any business the principal purpose of which is the enforcement of security interests. The term does not include --

    (A) any officer or employee of a creditor while, in the name of the creditor, collecting debts for such creditor;

    (B) any person while acting as a debt collector for another person, both of whom are related by common ownership or affiliated by corporate control, if the person acting as a debt collector does so only for persons to whom it is so related or affiliated and if the principal business of such person is not the collection of debts;

    (C) any officer or employee of the United States or any State to the extent that collecting or attempting to collect any debt is in the performance of his official duties;

    (D) any person while serving or attempting to serve legal process on any other person in connection with the judicial enforcement of any debt;

    (E) any nonprofit organization which, at the request of consumers, performs bona fide consumer credit counseling and assists consumers in the liquidation of their debts by receiving payments from such consumers and distributing such amounts to creditors; and

    (F) any person collecting or attempting to collect any debt owed or due or asserted to be owed or due another to the extent such activity (i) is incidental to a bona fide fiduciary obligation or a bona fide escrow arrangement; (ii) concerns a debt which was originated by such person; (iii) concerns a debt which was not in default at the time it was obtained by such person; or (iv) concerns a debt obtained by such person as a secured party in a commercial credit transaction involving the creditor.

    (7) The term "location information" means a consumer's place of abode and his telephone number at such place, or his place of employment.

    (8) The term "State" means any State, territory, or possession of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any political subdivision of any of the foregoing.

    § 804. Acquisition of location information [15 USC 1692b]

    Any debt collector communicating with any person other than the consumer for the purpose of acquiring location information about the consumer shall --

    (1) identify himself, state that he is confirming or correcting location information concerning the consumer, and, only if expressly requested, identify his employer;

    (2) not state that such consumer owes any debt;

    (3) not communicate with any such person more than once unless requested to do so by such person or unless the debt collector reasonably believes that the earlier response of such person is erroneous or incomplete and that such person now has correct or complete location information;

    (4) not communicate by post card;

    (5) not use any language or symbol on any envelope or in the contents of any communication effected by the mails or telegram that indicates that the debt collector is in the debt collection business or that the communication relates to the collection of a debt; and

    (6) after the debt collector knows the consumer is represented by an attorney with regard to the subject debt and has knowledge of, or can readily ascertain, such attorney's name and address, not communicate with any person other than that attorney, unless the attorney fails to respond within a reasonable period of time to the communication from the debt collector.

    § 805. Communication in connection with debt collection [15 USC 1692c]

    (a) COMMUNICATION WITH THE CONSUMER GENERALLY. Without the prior consent of the consumer given directly to the debt collector or the express permission of a court of competent jurisdiction, a debt collector may not communicate with a consumer in connection with the collection of any debt --

    (1) at any unusual time or place or a time or place known or which should be known to be inconvenient to the consumer. In the absence of knowledge of circumstances to the contrary, a debt collector shall assume that the convenient time for communicating with a consumer is after 8 o'clock anti meridian and before 9 o'clock postmeridian, local time at the consumer's location;

    (2) if the debt collector knows the consumer is represented by an attorney with respect to such debt and has knowledge of, or can readily ascertain, such attorney's name and address, unless the attorney fails to respond within a reasonable period of time to a communication from the debt collector or unless the attorney consents to direct communication with the consumer; or

    (3) at the consumer's place of employment if the debt collector knows or has reason to know that the consumer's employer prohibits the consumer from receiving such communication.

    (b) COMMUNICATION WITH THIRD PARTIES. Except as provided in section 804, without the prior consent of the consumer given directly to the debt collector, or the express permission of a court of competent jurisdiction, or as reasonably necessary to effectuate a post judgment judicial remedy, a debt collector may not communicate, in connection with the collection of any debt, with any person other than a consumer, his attorney, a consumer reporting agency if otherwise permitted by law, the creditor, the attorney of the creditor, or the attorney of the debt collector.

    (c) CEASING COMMUNICATION. If a consumer notifies a debt collector in writing that the consumer refuses to pay a debt or that the consumer wishes the debt collector to cease further communication with the consumer, the debt collector shall not communicate further with the consumer with respect to such debt, except --

    (1) to advise the consumer that the debt collector's further efforts are being terminated;

    (2) to notify the consumer that the debt collector or creditor may invoke specified remedies which are ordinarily invoked by such debt collector or creditor; or

    (3) where applicable, to notify the consumer that the debt collector or creditor intends to invoke a specified remedy.

    If such notice from the consumer is made by mail, notification shall be complete upon receipt.

    (d) For the purpose of this section, the term "consumer" includes the consumer's spouse, parent (if the consumer is a minor), guardian, executor, or administrator.

    § 806. Harassment or abuse [15 USC 1692d]

    A debt collector may not engage in any conduct the natural consequence of which is to harass, oppress, or abuse any person in connection with the collection of a debt. Without limiting the general application of the foregoing, the following conduct is a violation of this section:

    (1) The use or threat of use of violence or other criminal means to harm the physical person, reputation, or property of any person.

    (2) The use of obscene or profane language or language the natural consequence of which is to abuse the hearer or reader.

    (3) The publication of a list of consumers who allegedly refuse to pay debts, except to a consumer reporting agency or to persons meeting the requirements of section 603(f) or 604(3)1 of this Act.

    (4) The advertisement for sale of any debt to coerce payment of the debt.

    (5) Causing a telephone to ring or engaging any person in telephone conversation repeatedly or continuously with intent to annoy, abuse, or harass any person at the called number.

    (6) Except as provided in section 804, the placement of telephone calls without meaningful disclosure of the caller's identity.

    § 807. False or misleading representations [15 USC 1962e]

    A debt collector may not use any false, deceptive, or misleading representation or means in connection with the collection of any debt. Without limiting the general application of the foregoing, the following conduct is a violation of this section:

    (1) The false representation or implication that the debt collector is vouched for, bonded by, or affiliated with the United States or any State, including the use of any badge, uniform, or facsimile thereof.

    (2) The false representation of --

    (A) the character, amount, or legal status of any debt; or

    (B) any services rendered or compensation which may be lawfully received by any debt collector for the collection of a debt.

    (3) The false representation or implication that any individual is an attorney or that any communication is from an attorney.

    (4) The representation or implication that nonpayment of any debt will result in the arrest or imprisonment of any person or the seizure, garnishment, attachment, or sale of any property or wages of any person unless such action is lawful and the debt collector or creditor intends to take such action.

    (5) The threat to take any action that cannot legally be taken or that is not intended to be taken.

    (6) The false representation or implication that a sale, referral, or other transfer of any interest in a debt shall cause the consumer to --

    (A) lose any claim or defense to payment of the debt; or

    (B) become subject to any practice prohibited by this title.

    (7) The false representation or implication that the consumer committed any crime or other conduct in order to disgrace the consumer.

    (8) Communicating or threatening to communicate to any person credit information which is known or which should be known to be false, including the failure to communicate that a disputed debt is disputed.

    (9) The use or distribution of any written communication which simulates or is falsely represented to be a document authorized, issued, or approved by any court, official, or agency of the United States or any State, or which creates a false impression as to its source, authorization, or approval.

    (10) The use of any false representation or deceptive means to collect or attempt to collect any debt or to obtain information concerning a consumer.

    (11) The failure to disclose in the initial written communication with the consumer and, in addition, if the initial communication with the consumer is oral, in that initial oral communication, that the debt collector is attempting to collect a debt and that any information obtained will be used for that purpose, and the failure to disclose in subsequent communications that the communication is from a debt collector, except that this paragraph shall not apply to a formal pleading made in connection with a legal action.

    (12) The false representation or implication that accounts have been turned over to innocent purchasers for value.

    (13) The false representation or implication that documents are legal process.

    (14) The use of any business, company, or organization name other than the true name of the debt collector's business, company, or organization.

    (15) The false representation or implication that documents are not legal process forms or do not require action by the consumer.

    (16) The false representation or implication that a debt collector operates or is employed by a consumer reporting agency as defined by section 603(f) of this Act.

    § 808. Unfair practices [15 USC 1692f]

    A debt collector may not use unfair or unconscionable means to collect or attempt to collect any debt. Without limiting the general application of the foregoing, the following conduct is a violation of this section:

    (1) The collection of any amount (including any interest, fee, charge, or expense incidental to the principal obligation) unless such amount is expressly authorized by the agreement creating the debt or permitted by law.

    (2) The acceptance by a debt collector from any person of a check or other payment instrument postdated by more than five days unless such person is notified in writing of the debt collector's intent to deposit such check or instrument not more than ten nor less than three business days prior to such deposit.

    (3) The solicitation by a debt collector of any postdated check or other postdated payment instrument for the purpose of threatening or instituting criminal prosecution.

    (4) Depositing or threatening to deposit any postdated check or other postdated payment instrument prior to the date on such check or instrument.

    (5) Causing charges to be made to any person for communications by concealment of the true propose of the communication. Such charges include, but are not limited to, collect telephone calls and telegram fees.

    (6) Taking or threatening to take any nonjudicial action to effect dispossession or disablement of property if --

    (A) there is no present right to possession of the property claimed as collateral through an enforceable security interest;

    (B) there is no present intention to take possession of the property; or

    (C) the property is exempt by law from such dispossession or disablement.

    (7) Communicating with a consumer regarding a debt by post card.

    (8) Using any language or symbol, other than the debt collector's address, on any envelope when communicating with a consumer by use of the mails or by telegram, except that a debt collector may use his business name if such name does not indicate that he is in the debt collection business.

    § 809. Validation of debts [15 USC 1692g]

    (a) Within five days after the initial communication with a consumer in connection with the collection of any debt, a debt collector shall, unless the following information is contained in the initial communication or the consumer has paid the debt, send the consumer a written notice containing --

    (1) the amount of the debt;

    (2) the name of the creditor to whom the debt is owed;

    (3) a statement that unless the consumer, within thirty days after receipt of the notice, disputes the validity of the debt, or any portion thereof, the debt will be assumed to be valid by the debt collector;

    (4) a statement that if the consumer notifies the debt collector in writing within the thirty-day period that the debt, or any portion thereof, is disputed, the debt collector will obtain verification of the debt or a copy of a judgment against the consumer and a copy of such verification or judgment will be mailed to the consumer by the debt collector; and

    (5) a statement that, upon the consumer's written request within the thirty-day period, the debt collector will provide the consumer with the name and address of the original creditor, if different from the current creditor.

    (b) If the consumer notifies the debt collector in writing within the thirty-day period described in subsection (a) that the debt, or any portion thereof, is disputed, or that the consumer requests the name and address of the original creditor, the debt collector shall cease collection of the debt, or any disputed portion thereof, until the debt collector obtains verification of the debt or any copy of a judgment, or the name and address of the original creditor, and a copy of such verification or judgment, or name and address of the original creditor, is mailed to the consumer by the debt collector.

    (c) The failure of a consumer to dispute the validity of a debt under this section may not be construed by any court as an admission of liability by the consumer.

    § 810. Multiple debts [15 USC 1692h]

    If any consumer owes multiple debts and makes any single payment to any debt collector with respect to such debts, such debt collector may not apply such payment to any debt which is disputed by the consumer and, where applicable, shall apply such payment in accordance with the consumer's directions.

    § 811. Legal actions by debt collectors [15 USC 1692i]

    (a) Any debt collector who brings any legal action on a debt against any consumer shall --

    (1) in the case of an action to enforce an interest in real property securing the consumer's obligation, bring such action only in a judicial district or similar legal entity in which such real property is located; or

    (2) in the case of an action not described in paragraph (1), bring such action only in the judicial district or similar legal entity --

    (A) in which such consumer signed the contract sued upon; or

    (B) in which such consumer resides at the commencement of the action.

    (b) Nothing in this title shall be construed to authorize the bringing of legal actions by debt collectors.

    § 812. Furnishing certain deceptive forms [15 USC 1692j]

    (a) It is unlawful to design, compile, and furnish any form knowing that such form would be used to create the false belief in a consumer that a person other than the creditor of such consumer is participating in the collection of or in an attempt to collect a debt such consumer allegedly owes such creditor, when in fact such person is not so participating.

    (b) Any person who violates this section shall be liable to the same extent and in the same manner as a debt collector is liable under section 813 for failure to comply with a provision of this title.

    § 813. Civil liability [15 USC 1692k]

    (a) Except as otherwise provided by this section, any debt collector who fails to comply with any provision of this title with respect to any person is liable to such person in an amount equal to the sum of --

    (1) any actual damage sustained by such person as a result of such failure;

    (2) (A) in the case of any action by an individual, such additional damages as the court may allow, but not exceeding $1,000; or

    (B) in the case of a class action, (i) such amount for each named plaintiff as could be recovered under subparagraph (A), and (ii) such amount as the court may allow for all other class members, without regard to a minimum individual recovery, not to exceed the lesser of $500,000 or 1 per centum of the net worth of the debt collector; and

    (3) in the case of any successful action to enforce the foregoing liability, the costs of the action, together with a reasonable attorney's fee as determined by the court. On a finding by the court that an action under this section was brought in bad faith and for the purpose of harassment, the court may award to the defendant attorney's fees reasonable in relation to the work expended and costs.

    (b) In determining the amount of liability in any action under subsection (a), the court shall consider, among other relevant factors --

    (1) in any individual action under subsection (a)(2)(A), the frequency and persistence of noncompliance by the debt collector, the nature of such noncompliance, and the extent to which such noncompliance was intentional; or

    (2) in any class action under subsection (a)(2)(B), the frequency and persistence of noncompliance by the debt collector, the nature of such noncompliance, the resources of the debt collector, the number of persons adversely affected, and the extent to which the debt collector's noncompliance was intentional.

    (c) A debt collector may not be held liable in any action brought under this title if the debt collector shows by a preponderance of evidence that the violation was not intentional and resulted from a bona fide error notwithstanding the maintenance of procedures reasonably adapted to avoid any such error.

    (d) An action to enforce any liability created by this title may be brought in any appropriate United States district court without regard to the amount in controversy, or in any other court of competent jurisdiction, within one year from the date on which the violation occurs.

    (e) No provision of this section imposing any liability shall apply to any act done or omitted in good faith in conformity with any advisory opinion of the Commission, notwithstanding that after such act or omission has occurred, such opinion is amended, rescinded, or determined by judicial or other authority to be invalid for any reason.

    § 814. Administrative enforcement [15 USC 1692l]

    (a) Compliance with this title shall be enforced by the Commission, except to the extend that enforcement of the requirements imposed under this title is specifically committed to another agency under subsection (b). For purpose of the exercise by the Commission of its functions and powers under the Federal Trade Commission Act, a violation of this title shall be deemed an unfair or deceptive act or practice in violation of that Act. All of the functions and powers of the Commission under the Federal Trade Commission Act are available to the Commission to enforce compliance by any person with this title, irrespective of whether that person is engaged in commerce or meets any other jurisdictional tests in the Federal Trade Commission Act, including the power to enforce the provisions of this title in the same manner as if the violation had been a violation of a Federal Trade Commission trade regulation rule.

    (b) Compliance with any requirements imposed under this title shall be enforced under --

    (1) section 8 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, in the case of --

    (A) national banks, by the Comptroller of the Currency;

    (B) member banks of the Federal Reserve System (other than national banks), by the Federal Reserve Board; and

    (C) banks the deposits or accounts of which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (other than members of the Federal Reserve System), by the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation;

    (2) section 5(d) of the Home Owners Loan Act of 1933, section 407 of the National Housing Act, and sections 6(i) and 17 of the Federal Home Loan Bank Act, by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (acting directing or through the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation), in the case of any institution subject to any of those provisions;

    (3) the Federal Credit Union Act, by the Administrator of the National Credit Union Administration with respect to any Federal credit union;

    (4) subtitle IV of Title 49, by the Interstate Commerce Commission with respect to any common carrier subject to such subtitle;

    (5) the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, by the Secretary of Transportation with respect to any air carrier or any foreign air carrier subject to that Act; and

    (6) the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921 (except as provided in section 406 of that Act), by the Secretary of Agriculture with respect to any activities subject to that Act.

    (c) For the purpose of the exercise by any agency referred to in subsection (b) of its powers under any Act referred to in that subsection, a violation of any requirement imposed under this title shall be deemed to be a violation of a requirement imposed under that Act. In addition to its powers under any provision of law specifically referred to in subsection (b), each of the agencies referred to in that subsection may exercise, for the purpose of enforcing compliance with any requirement imposed under this title any other authority conferred on it by law, except as provided in subsection (d).

    (d) Neither the Commission nor any other agency referred to in subsection (b) may promulgate trade regulation rules or other regulations with respect to the collection of debts by debt collectors as defined in this title.

    § 815. Reports to Congress by the Commission [15 USC 1692m]

    (a) Not later than one year after the effective date of this title and at one-year intervals thereafter, the Commission shall make reports to the Congress concerning the administration of its functions under this title, including such recommendations as the Commission deems necessary or appropriate. In addition, each report of the Commission shall include its assessment of the extent to which compliance with this title is being achieved and a summary of the enforcement actions taken by the Commission under section 814 of this title.

    (b) In the exercise of its functions under this title, the Commission may obtain upon request the views of any other Federal agency which exercises enforcement functions under section 814 of this title.

    § 816. Relation to State laws [15 USC 1692n]

    This title does not annul, alter, or affect, or exempt any person subject to the provisions of this title from complying with the laws of any State with respect to debt collection practices, except to the extent that those laws are inconsistent with any provision of this title, and then only to the extent of the inconsistency. For purposes of this section, a State law is not inconsistent with this title if the protection such law affords any consumer is greater than the protection provided by this title.

    § 817. Exemption for State regulation [15 USC 1692o]

    The Commission shall by regulation exempt from the requirements of this title any class of debt collection practices within any State if the Commission determines that under the law of that State that class of debt collection practices is subject to requirements substantially similar to those imposed by this title, and that there is adequate provision for enforcement.

    § 818. Effective date [15 USC 1692 note]

    This title takes effect upon the expiration of six months after the date of its enactment, but section 809 shall apply only with respect to debts for which the initial attempt to collect occurs after such effective date.

    Approved September 20, 1977

    ENDNOTES

    1. So in original; however, should read "604(a)(3)."

    LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:

    Public Law 95-109 [H.R. 5294]

    HOUSE REPORT No. 95-131 (Comm. on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs).

    SENATE REPORT No. 95-382 (Comm. on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs).

    CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 123 (1977):

    Apr. 4, considered and passed House.

    Aug. 5, considered and passed Senate, amended.

    Sept. 8, House agreed to Senate amendment.

    WEEKLY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS, Vol. 13, No. 39:

    Sept. 20, Presidential statement.

    AMENDMENTS:

    SECTION 621, SUBSECTIONS (b)(3), (b)(4) and (b)(5) were amended to transfer certain administrative enforcement responsibilities, pursuant to Pub. L. 95-473, § 3(b), Oct. 17, 1978. 92 Stat. 166; Pub. L. 95-630, Title V. § 501, November 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3680; Pub. L. 98-443, § 9(h), Oct. 4, 1984, 98 Stat. 708.

    SECTION 803, SUBSECTION (6), defining "debt collector," was amended to repeal the attorney at law exemption at former Section (6)(F) and to redesignate Section 803(6)(G) pursuant to Pub. L. 99-361, July 9, 1986, 100 Stat. 768. For legislative history, see H.R. 237, HOUSE REPORT No. 99-405 (Comm. on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs). CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: Vol. 131 (1985): Dec. 2, considered and passed House. Vol. 132 (1986): June 26, considered and passed Senate.

    SECTION 807, SUBSECTION (11), was amended to affect when debt collectors must state (a) that they are attempting to collect a debt and (b) that information obtained will be used for that purpose, pursuant to Pub. L. 104-208 § 2305, 110 Stat. 3009 (Sept. 30, 1996).


    Read more...